Site icon Joel C. Rosenberg's Blog

In a zero-sum game, the U.S. should hold its nose and back the Egyptian military, argues a WSJ columnist. Is he right?

Advertisements

(Washington, D.C.) — The violence in Egypt is horrific, heart-breaking and painful to watch. The question is: What do we do about it?

The Wall Street Journal’s Bret Stephens writes a thought-provoking column today that I commend to your attention. The former editor-in-chief of the Jerusalem Post raises a very important question. He argues it is time for the U.S. government to be crystal clear: Is the U.S. on the side of the Egyptian military to defeat Radical Islam, restore some sense of law & order, and protect minority groups (like the Coptic Christians), or is the U.S. on the side of the Muslim Brotherhood which seeks to impose Radical Islam, establish Sharia law and spread the Islamic revolution?

Stephens argues that Senators and Congressmen — and administration officials — who call for cutting off U.S. aid to the Egyptian military are effectively supporting the Brotherhood. Is that really the right policy?

The Daily Alert website (tracking key stories in the Middle East) sums up Stephens’ argument as follows.

To read Stephens’ full column — which I recommend — please click here.

Is Stephens’ right? What do you think?

RELATED HEADLINES WORTH TRACKING:

Exit mobile version