With Intl. Holocaust Remembrance Day approaching, Rep. Cantor to make 1st visit to Auschwitz. Canadian PM Harper visits Yad Vashem. How will you remember and teach others?

Canadian PM Stephen Harper lays a wreath at Yad Vashem to honor the 6 million Jews murdered in the Holocaust.

Canadian PM Stephen Harper lays a wreath at Yad Vashem to honor the 6 million Jews murdered in the Holocaust.

Next week — January 27th — is International Holocaust Remembrance Day. Senior U.S., Canadian and Israeli officials are taking special steps to remember the six million Jews who were murdered by the Nazis and to remind the world what happens when evil rises and the free world does not take decisive action.

I would encourage you to do something to mark the day and teach your family and friends, as well.

If you can, visit the U.S. Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C. Or watch a Holocaust-related film, like Steven Spielberg’s Schindler’s List of Roberto Benigni in Life Is Beautiful. Or read a good book on the subject, like Night by Elie Wiesel, or The Hiding Place by Corrie Ten Boom, or William Shirer’s masterpiece, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. Spend the day in prayer for those who survived the Holocaust. Pray for their families and friends. Pray, too, for the peace of Jerusalem and for the Lord to protect Israel and the Jewish people from those who seek to do them harm again.

I wish my new novel, The Auschwitz Escape, was already published. Unfortunately, it does not release until March 18th. But this is going to be a very important year in Holocaust education, with notable anniversaries of major events, including D-Day and the 70th anniversary of the escape of several actual heroes from Auschwitz, which inspired the novel. My hope is that this novel will be deeply moving for you, and teach you a great deal, a book you’ll want to share with a friend and sit down and discuss over a cup of tea or coffee.

As more time goes by, fewer and fewer people have really learned much about the Holocaust. We are in danger of forgetting history and its lessons.

Thus, I’m very encouraged that several major Western leaders are focusing on the Holocaust themselves and drawing attention to it at this time.

Rep. Eric Cantor, the House Majority Leader and highest ranking Jewish official in Congress, “will travel to Auschwitz-Birkenau on International Holocaust Remembrance Day next week, taking part in an unprecedented event with Israeli, Polish and Russian officials,” reports the Jerusalem Post.

“Cantor will be joined by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Patrick McHenry (R-NC) at the mega-event with the Knesset’s largest-ever delegation abroad, even though it will take place on January 27, the day before the State of the Union Address,” the Post noted, adding that 64 Members of the Knesset will be attending the special ceremonies along with 30 Holocaust survivors. 

“This is a priority for [Cantor],” a source said, explaining the Majority Leader’s willingness to attend the event despite the tight schedule. “He’s never been to Auschwitz before.”

Today, senior Canadian leaders have been visiting Yad Vashem, the Israeli Holocaust memorial and research center.

“Prime Minister Stephen Harper paid his respects to Jewish victims of the Holocaust during a visit today to Yad Vashem memorial on the third day of his Middle East tour,” reported the Canadian Broadcasting Company (CBC). “He was joined by his official delegation, which includes Conservative MPs and cabinet ministers. According to the CBC’s Terry Milewski, Harper’s note in the memorial’s guestbook reads, ‘They are remembered always, in our hearts, in our prayers and most importantly in our resolve. Never again.'”

————————

Here are more details on The Auschwitz Escape for those not yet familiar with it.

Unlike any other novel I’ve written, this is a work of historical fiction. It was inspired by two sets of true  and deeply-moving stories from World War II.

The first involved a small group of German Jews, members of the underground, who made it their mission to rescue their fellow Jews, and sabotage the Nazis at every turn, until they were discovered by the Gestapo, arrested and sent to concentration camps.

The second involved a small group of Protestant Christian pastors and their families in a small town in south-central France who also made it their mission to rescue Jews escaping the Nazi nightmare, and until they, too, were discovered by the Gestapo, arrested, and sent to the camps. 

After visiting Auschwitz in the fall of 2011, I became intrigued with reading everything I could get my hands on about these two groups of people, talking to Holocaust experts, tracking down out-of-print books, meeting with Holocaust survivors, watching old documentaries, and trying to understand who these folks were, what they did, and why they did it.

What I would come to discover were stories of such pain and heartbreak inside the death camps, but also stories of such courage and hope and unbelievable heroism. Until I set out on this journey, I had no idea that an entire town in France was awarded “Righteous Among the Nations” status by the Israeli government for their efforts to rescue Jews fleeing the Holocaust. I had no idea that over 800 people tried to escape from Auschwitz, and that a handful of them actually succeeded. I had no idea that some of those who escaped did so not only to save their own lives, but to tell the Jewish communities of Europe, the Allied leadership in London and Washington, and the free world of the terrible atrocities being committed in the death camps, and to urge the world to act decisively to liberate the death camps before it was too late. Yet the more I learned, the more intrigued I became and the more determined I became to somehow convey their profound stories.

This spring will mark the 70th anniversary since those men — long-since forgotten by the world, if they were ever known at all – made their daring, spectacular,  indeed miraculous escapes from the world’s most infamous death camp. This year will also mark the 70th anniversary of the release of their eyewitness account, known as “The Auschwitz Protocol,” as well as of D-Day and the Allied effort to liberate Europe and end the Third Reich once and for all. And next January — 2015 – we will mark the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, and shortly thereafter the fall of Berlin, the death of Adolf Hitler, the Allied victory and the end of World War II. Thus, I decided if there were ever time to write such a book and try to help people remember this history, to be drawn into it, to experience it emotionally and even to draw lessons from it for our time, it seemed like this was the moment.

While The Auschwitz Escape is a work of fiction, it is based on several years worth of research, including meetings with scholars at Yad Vashem. It is a very different book from anything I’ve ever written before, and was by far the most difficult novel I’ve ever attempted. But whether you’re Jewish or Christian, of another faith, or no faith at all, I hope you’ll find this journey into the heart of darkness and back again as compelling as I have. What’s more, I hope you’ll find this book to meditate on and discuss with others. Above all, my hope is this book will inspire you to press in and learn more about the real men and women whose lives inspired me, and ask yourself what you would do if darkness fell and evil rose and all that you knew and loved was swept away in a breath-taking, heart-stopping instant of time.

>> To read an excerpt from The Auschwitz Escape, please click here.

>> To pre-order copies of The Auschwitz Escape, please click here, or visit your favorite local bookstore.

Nuclear deal would leave Iran 2 to 3 weeks from The Bomb, says former senior UN nuclear official.

iran-nuclear-graphic(Washington, D.C.) — The Obama administration and the rest of the P5+1 leaders are adamant that the interim nuclear deal on the table is:

A) the best that can be accomplished; and

B) will make it much harder for Iran to build the Bomb.

Are either of these things true?

Not according to a former senior IAEA nuclear official who says Iran could break the deal at any time and be just two to three weeks away from building operational nuclear warheads.

“One day before Iran began implementing its nuclear deal with world powers, a former United Nations watchdog said the Islamic Republic would only be two to three weeks away from a nuclear weapon if the agreement were broken,” reports Haaretz.

“Olli Heinonen, former deputy director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, appeared on a Sunday radio show, where he discussed recent remarks from Iran’s top nuclear negotiator,” the Israeli daily newspaper noted. “Abbas Araghchi said last week that Iran could resume enriching uranium to levels prohibited by the nuclear deal in one day’s time. Heinonen told Aaron Klein’s WABC Radio show that it would take Iran ‘two, three weeks to have enough uranium hexafluoride high-enriched for one single weapon.'”….

“If [Iran] in reality [breaks the deal] tomorrow, they still have quite a substantial stock of uranium hexafluoride, which is enriched to 20 percent,” said Heinonen. “So if this all happens in the next, let’s say, weeks, this is really true. They can start to produce 20-percent enriched uranium….They have to put perhaps some 6,000 centrifuges to work in this kind of a mode.

“If they do that, which they can technically do, it will take certainly a little bit more than one night to do. But then once they have sorted it out, it would take about two, three weeks to have enough uranium hexafluoride high-enriched for one single weapon,” Heinonen added.

————————

Canadian PM pledges $66 million in new support for the Palestinians.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas during the welcome ceremony in the West Bank city of Ramallah, January 20, 2014 (photo credit: Issam Rimawi/Flash90/Times of Israel)

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas during the welcome ceremony in the West Bank city of Ramallah, January 20, 2014 (photo credit: Issam Rimawi/Flash90/Times of Israel)

Fortunately, Canadian Prime Minister Harper’s support for Israel does not diminish his and Canada’s deep respect and support for the Palestinian people.

“Canada will provide $66 million in economic aid to the Palestinians, in order to help foster ‘peace and stability’ in the region, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Monday,” reports the Times of Israel. “The announcement came hours before Harper was scheduled to speak in front of the Israeli Knesset, in an address widely expected to be supportive of Israeli government positions.”

Excerpts:

  • Speaking during a visit to the West Bank Palestinian city of Ramallah, Harper stressed that his country strongly supports the establishment of a future Palestinian state, and said the aid provided by Canada would assist in creating a more secure and just Palestinian society.
  • “Canada looks forward to a bright future for all Palestinians, one in which security and prosperity are enjoyed in a viable and democratic Palestinian state,” Harper said after a meeting with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.
  • “The support we are providing today will advance those goals by furthering the peace process, generating jobs and economic growth through private sector partnerships, and helping to further advance security and justice sector reforms.”
  • The aid announced by Harper in Ramallah, as well as an additional $30 million allocated for the West Bank and Gaza last year, will be provided to the Palestinians over a three- to five-year period, the Vancouver Sun reported.
  • Since the Oslo peace accords were signed in 1993, Canada provided more than $650 million in assistance to the Palestinian Authority. Close to half of the said funds were transferred over the past five years.
  • Under Harper, Canada has been seen as one of Israel’s staunchest allies, backing the Jewish state at the United Nations and working to isolate Iran. But in Ramallah, Harper insisted that his government did not intentionally favor Israel, and said his country’s policy was free of outside influence.
  • “Canada is a strong supporter of the peace process,” Harper said.
  • “Our position is not an Israeli position or a Palestinian position; it is a Canadian position of principle supported by the overwhelming majority of Canadians. While Canada has its views, a settlement ultimately has to be decided through negotiations between the two parties.”

Canadian PM Harper visits the epicenter. Tells Israel: “Through fire and water, Canada will stand with you.” Brings delegation of 208 Canadians, including Rabbis & Pastors. Also, read full text of Harper address.

harper-net-flagsAt a time when so many world leaders are turning away from Israel and trying to isolate the Jewish state, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper — an evangelical Christian and the most pro-Israel world leader on the planet at this time — arrived in Jerusalem on Sunday for his first visit, telling the Israeli people, “through fire and water, Canada will stand with you.”

Harper was given the red carpet treatment by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu with whom he has become a close and personal friend, as well as a staunch and reliable ally. He and his wife, Laureen, dined with Netanyahu and his wife, Sara. The Harpers also toured several Christian holy sites, and plan to visit several more — including sites around the Sea of Galilee — during their trip.

Harper brought with him a delegation of 208 Canadians, including 21 Rabbis, 27 CEOs of Canadian companies, as well as numerous evangelical pastors and Catholic priests.

On Monday, Harper became the first Canadian Prime Minister in history to address the Israeli Knesset. He reaffirmed the importance of Israel as “a Jewish state,” and was given a standing ovation for his long-standing and warm friendship and support for the State of Israel and the Jewish people.

“It is right to support Israel because after generations of persecutions the Jewish people deserve their own homeland,” Harper told the Israeli parliament. “I believe the story of Israel is a great example to the world. It is a story, essentially, of a people whose response to suffering has been to move beyond resentment and build a most extraordinary society, a vibrant democracy, a freedom-loving country with an independent and rights-affirming judiciary. An innovative, world-leading ‘start-up’ nation. You have taken the collective memory of death and persecution to build an optimistic, forward-looking land, one that so values life, you will sometimes release a thousand criminals and terrorists, to save one of your own. In the democratic family of nations, Israel represents values which our Government takes as articles of faith, and principles to drive our national life. And therefore, through fire and water, Canada will stand with you.”

To read the text of his extraordinary speech, please click here (scroll to the bottom of the Haaretz article where the video of the speech is located).

Harper met with Palestinian Chairman Mahmoud Abbas on Monday morning. Later this week, he will visit Jordan and meet with King Abdullah II in Amman, deeply committed as he is to encouraging peace between Israel and the Arab people.

“Prime Minister Harper, my good friend Stephen, welcome to Jerusalem,” said Netanyahu said on Sunday upon welcoming Harper at his office, reported Israel Hayom. “I have to say, Stephen, that you are a great friend of Israel and the Jewish people. I’m not just saying that — I mean it deeply from the bottom of my heart and I speak for all the people of Israel….This world is often cynical and hypocritical, and you have shown great moral leadership. When it comes to fighting terrorism, you know that there cannot be any politically correct double talk, but only unequivocal condemnation and united international action….When it comes to anti-Semitism, you have stood up unabashedly at the side of Israel and the entire Jewish people, I think at the side of decency and fairness to everyone: Jews and non-Jews alike. And when it comes to Iran’s repeated calls for Israel’s annihilation and its unrelenting development of nuclear weapons — you and Canada have stood unflinchingly on the right side of history.”

“Touching on the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations,” Israel Hayom noted, Netanyahu told Harper, “You recognize that a genuine peace, a lasting peace, must be based on mutual recognition and sound security arrangements on the ground. I think in all this and in so many other things, you have shown courage, clarity and conviction. And in standing up for the truth, your voice, Stephen, has been an indispensable one,” Netanyahu said. “So the people of Israel and I deeply appreciate your friendship and the friendship of the people of Canada to us.”

Amidst peace talks, Gaza terrorists have fired at least 18 rockets at Israel since Jan. 1.

Rocket being fired from Gaza Strip at southern Israel.

Rocket being fired from Gaza Strip at southern Israel.

>> MONDAY UPDATE: Loud explosions heard in Eilat — IDF troops dispatched to area to search for source, thought to be rockets (Times of Israel)

Even as Secretary of State John Kerry continues shuttling in and out the epicenter in search of a final, comprehensive peace treaty between the Israelis and Palestinians — and continues pressuring Netanyahu to make deeper and deeper concessions — terrorist rocket fire emanating from Gaza and targeting Jewish civilians in southern Israel is steadily increasing.

“January has seen an upsurge in Palestinian rocket  attacks from Gaza on southern Israel, with 18 projectiles fired since the start  of the month,” reports the Jerusalem Post.

“The Israel Air Force struck an Islamic Jihad member in the northern Gaza Strip  on Sunday morning who had been involved in a spate of rocket attacks against  Israel,” noted the Post. “Security sources said following the strike that Islamic Jihad, as the non-sovereign party in Gaza, was exploiting its position to attack Israel,  and that the coming hours would determine whether Hamas would be able to  exercise its authority as Gaza’s ruler to reinstate the truce with  Israel. The target of the strike, named as Ahmed Sa’ad, took part in the firing of rockets at southern Israeli communities, the IDF said, and planned  further attacks in the near future. Sunday’s air strike can be seen as a message from the IDF that  Israel is prepared to target terrorists personally involved in the  attacks.”

“It’s a signal that we won’t tolerate a drizzle of rockets,” a senior security source said.

“Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon said Sunday that Israel will not allow anyone to return it to a ‘routine’ of rocket fire, warning that ‘those who try to do so will pay a very high price,'” noted the Post.  “We see Hamas as being responsible for what occurs in the Gaza Strip, and if it does not know how to enforce its sovereignty on what takes place on the ground, we’ll keep hitting its interests. I would not recommend that anyone in the Gaza Strip test our patience and determination to protect the security of  Israeli civilians.”

Please pray that the rocket fire is effectively stopped. Please pray for the innocent civilians on both sides of the border find safety and security. Please also pray for the Lord to give wisdom to the diplomats and government officials in the region to make peace.

>> To learn more about the work of The Joshua Fund — and make a contribution — please click here.

Why is Canada’s evangelical Christian Prime Minister heading to Israel?

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper (R) in Ottawa, Canada. March 02, 2012. (photo credit: Amos Ben Gershom/ GPO/ Flash90/Times of Israel)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper (R) in Ottawa, Canada. March 02, 2012. (photo credit: Amos Ben Gershom/ GPO/ Flash90/Times of Israel)

“It took seven years, but one of Israel’s staunchest allies among world leaders will be making his maiden voyage to the Jewish state on Sunday,” reports the Times of Israel and the JTA. “In announcing the trip last month at a Jewish National Fund dinner, where he was being honored, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper called Israel “a light of freedom and democracy in what is otherwise a region of darkness” and pledged that the Jewish state ‘will always have Canada as a friend.'”

Excerpts from the article:

  • Since his election in 2006, the Conservative prime minister has been full throated, unapologetic and seemingly indifferent to consequence in his support for Israel.
  • Harper was the first Western leader to cut aid to the Palestinian Authority following Hamas’ 2006 seizure of power in Gaza and the first to withdraw from the second U.N. World Conference Against Racism, known as Durban II, saying the event would “scapegoat the Jewish people.”
  • Canada has sided openly with Israel in every one of its military operations since 2006. Harper’s Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu, calls him Stephen, and the two speak regularly.
  • Earlier this month, Harper appointed Vivian Bercovici, a Toronto lawyer and an outspoken Israel supporter, as Canada’s ambassador to Israel.
  • Harper has backed Israel with such fervor that some scholars and diplomats “rank it as the most dramatic shift in the history of postwar Canadian foreign policy,” according to journalist Marci McDonald’s 2011 book, “The Armageddon Factor: The Rise of Christian Nationalism in Canada.”
  • The jolting change has left many of Canada’s 375,000 Jews swooning following decades in which Ottawa sought a more neutral posture toward Israel. And they have repaid the good will: Polls showed that for the first time, more than half of Canadian Jews (52 percent) voted for Harper’s Tories in the 2011 election, a historic departure from their traditional base in the Liberal Party.
  • Observers agree that Harper, an evangelical Christian, stands to gain little by supporting Israel and in fact may be paying a price. Canada failed in its 2010 bid for a seat on the U.N. Security Council for the first time, a result some attributed to its foreign policy in general and support for Israel in particular.
  • Politically, Harper also has little to gain and much to lose. The shift in Jewish voting has helped Conservatives only in about 10 of Canada’s 308 electoral districts, though Jewish voters in three key Toronto-area districts helped replace Liberal members of parliament with Conservatives, two of whom are Jewish themselves. Among Muslims, a community roughly triple the size of Jews in Canada, Harper won a meager 12 percent in the last election.
  • “I do think his support for Israel is a principled one because he will stand to lose more non-Jewish votes than gain Jewish ones by his forthright defense of the country,” said Henry Srebrnik, who got to know Harper when he taught at the University of Calgary in the early 1990s and Harper represented the city in the House of Commons. “I doubt there was any sudden epiphany when it comes to Israel, but more likely a growing, and probably somewhat religiously based, admiration for the Jewish state.”
  • Harper is Canada’s first evangelical prime minister in 50 years, and most observers accept that his faith plays some role in his support for Israel. Toronto Rabbi Philip Scheim, who will accompany Harper to Israel, dismissed the notion that Harper’s support for Israel is part of an “end-of-days, apocalyptic scenario.”
  • “I sense that he sees Israel as a manifestation of justice and a righting of historical wrongs, especially in light of the Holocaust,” Scheim said.

To read the rest of the article, please click here.

Iran nuclear deal: Who gets what? White House releases details.

iran-flag(Washington, D.C.) — “Iran and six world powers — the US, Britain, Germany, France, Russia and China — have reached a technical understanding to begin implementing an agreement to rollback Iran’s nuclear program,” reports the Associated Press and the Times of Israel.

“The deal, coordinated by the European Union, aims to reassure the international community that Iran is not trying to develop a nuclear weapon,” noted the report. “In exchange, Iran will see a six-month suspension in sanctions that have crippled its economy. During that period, negotiators will work to craft a comprehensive, final agreement.”

On Thursday, the White House released details of the deal:

What Iran has committed to do:

—Halt production of near 20 percent enriched uranium and disable the centrifuge process used to produce it.

—Start neutralizing its near 20 percent enriched uranium stockpile.

—Refrain from enriching uranium in nearly half of the installed centrifuges at its Natanz site and three-quarters of installed centrifuges at its Fordow site.

—Limit centrifuge production to what’s needed to replace damaged machines.

—Refrain from building additional enrichment facilities or advancing research and development of enrichment.

—Refrain from commissioning, fueling or adding reactor components to its Arak reactor, and halt the production and additional testing of fuel for the reactor.

—Refrain from building a facility capable of reprocessing, which would allow Iran to separate out plutonium, which could be used to make nuclear bombs.

—————-

If Iran keeps its end of the bargain, the six nations and the EU have committed to:

—Suspend implementation of sanctions on Iran’s petrochemical exports and sanctions on goods imported for use in its automotive industry.

—Suspend sanctions on Iran’s import and export of gold and other precious metals.

—Pause efforts to further curtail Iranian crude oil purchases by six economies.

—Free up Iranian money to help pay the educational costs of young Iranians, many of whom are attending US colleges and universities.

—Raises tenfold the ceilings for money transfers to and from Iran.

—Take actions to ease Iran’s access to $4.2 billion in restricted Iranian funds in several installments.

Sales of Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” manifesto are skyrocketing. But why?

mein-kampfIs it a sign of surging global anti-Semitism, or merely evidence of historical curiosity, enabled by the privacy afforded by the emergence of the “e-book”?

Only time will tell, but one thing is certain — e-book sales of Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler’s anti-Jewish manifesto, are skyrocketing.

“Adolf Hitler’s anti-Semitic political testament, Mein Kampf, is surging up electronic book bestseller lists, even as sales of the printed version have been stagnant for years,” reported ABC News on January 10th. “As of Wednesday, two electronic versions of Mein Kampf ranked 12th and 15th in the Politics & Current events section of the iTunes book store. On Amazon, Hitler’s polemic ranked number one in the Propaganda & Political psychology section.  There are currently six e-book versions of Mein Kampf.”

“One explanation offered for the surge in electronic sales concerns the relative anonymity offered by e-books as compared to their printed counterparts, ” notes ABC. “‘These are things that people would be embarrassed to read otherwise,’ journalist Chris Faraone, who wrote about the trend for Vocativ.com told ABC News. ‘Books that people would probably be a bit more embarrassed to read or display or buy in public, they are more than willing to buy on their Kindle, or iPads.’ Faraone believes the phenomenon is similar to that surrounding erotic novel Fifty Shades of Grey, which in 2012, became the first to sell more than 1 million copies on Amazon’s Kindle e-reader. ’50 Shades of Grey is something you would probably be embarrassed to read in public,’ said Faraone, but added that the anonymity offered by e-readers ensures that readers with a latent interest in controversial subject matter can read the books freely without arousing suspicion. Let’s say you have a latent curiosity, [Mein Kampf] is very present in ebook stores, you don’t have to go out of your way to find it, it’s a no-brainer, Faraone said.”

“Hitler wrote Mein Kampf while imprisoned following the failed attempt of the then-fledgling Nazi party to seize power in Munich in 1923,” notes ABC. “Its anti-Semitic themes and racial ideas became the blueprint for National Socialist ideology.  It became the most popular book in Germany after Hitler became Chancellor in 1933. The book has seen a resurgence in popularity in recent years.  In 2005, when it was first published in Turkey, it sold 100,000 copies in two months alone, the Guardian reported, citing the book’s publishers. Jewish leaders have expressed alarm that companies would profit from surging digital sales of Mein Kampf.”

“While the academic study of Mein Kampf is certainly legitimate, the spike in ebook sales likely comes from neo-Nazis and skinheads idolizing the greatest monster in history,” World Jewish Congress CEO Robert Singer told ABC News in an emailed statement.

>> To learn more about my forthcoming novel, The Auschwitz Escape, including reading an excerpt — or pre-ordering a copy before the March 18th release — please click here.

What’s the chance of an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal in 2014? King Abdullah II & PM Netanyahu meet in Amman to discuss.

Israeli PM Netanyahu met this morning with Jordanian King Abdullah II to discuss latest developments in the peace process.

Israeli PM Netanyahu met this morning with Jordanian King Abdullah II to discuss latest developments in the peace process.

>> Video footage of Netanyahu arrival in Jordan & meeting with the King.

(Washington, D.C.) — What are the prospects of an actual Israeli-Palestinian peace deal in 2014?

There are no shortage of reports coming out of the region saying the talks are going nowhere and are about to collapse. Maybe those rumors will prove accurate. But what if they prove to be a smoke screen to hide the fact that the two sides are inching closer to a deal?

One thing is certain is that Israeli and Jordanian officials are engaging each other at the highest possible level to make sure that if a deal is struck — and that’s still a big “if” — the security concerns of both sides will be fully and properly factored in.

To that end, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Jordan’s King Abdullah II huddled for several hours in a previously unannounced meeting in Amman. Together, they discussed the latest developments in the peace process and how to handle some of the most sensitive security issues.

Among them:

* How can Israel and Jordan make sure the Jordan River valley does not become a safe haven for terrorists?

* How can Israel and Jordan make sure that the Palestinian state, should there be one, doesn’t become a militarized and hostile state that could threaten its neighbors?

* Is it possible that a future Palestinian state could form some form of confederation with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan whereby the Jordanians had some measure of influence over and responsibility for overall security? (this was an idea first floated by the late-King Hussein, was embraced by some Israeli officials, dismissed by most Palestinian leaders, and remains an idea that, while controversy, remains in play.)

I’ll write more on these issues in the weeks ahead. For now, here is some of the coverage of today’s meeting between Netanyahu and the King.

“Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made an unannounced visit to neighbouring Jordan on Thursday for talks with King Abdullah II on the Middle East peace process, palace officials said,” reports Agence France Presse. “The rare meeting in Amman comes as US Secretary of State John Kerry presses Israel and the Palestinians to agree on a framework to guide peace talks forward.”

“King Abdullah and Netanyahu discussed peace process developments in light of the current US-sponsored Israeli-Palestinians peace negotiations,” a palace statement said.

AFP noted that the palace statement said the meeting “seeks to make sure a progress in the peace talks would meet Palestinian aspirations and at the same time protect Jordanian interests, particularly final status issues at this critical stage.” It add that the king told Netanyahu, “Jordan’s interests top our priorities.” Abdullah urged Israel and the Palestinians to “seize the current opportunity and intensified efforts by Kerry to achieve tangible progress… and create the suitable atmosphere for the success of peace negotiations,” the statement said. It added that Netanyahu “briefed the king on the track of peace talks as well as US efforts.”

“Netanyahu’s last visit to Jordan was in February last year,” reported AFP.

“Jerusalem will take Jordan’s security interests into consideration in any peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu assured Jordan’s King Abdullah on Thursday,” reports Haaretz. “Netanyahu returned to Jerusalem early Thursday afternoon, after meeting with the king at his palace in Amman. Netanyahu’s office did not announce the visit prior to his return to Israel.”

“The prime minister emphasized the important role Jordan, under the leadership of King Abdullah, plays in the efforts to achieve a peace agreement with the Palestinians,” said a statement from the Prime Minister’s Office, noted Haaretz. “The prime minister stressed that Israel has placed an emphasis on security arrangements, including Jordanian interests, in any future agreement,” adding that any deal would take into consideration the peace treaty signed between Israel and Jordan 20 years ago.

The article further noted:

  • Netanyahu was in Amman for closed-door talks with the king on the latest about the latest “developments in the peace process” brokered by the United States.
  • Netanyahu made at least three similar visits to Jordan last year.
  • Jordan maintains cordial relations with Israel under a peace treaty signed in 1994 — one of only two signed agreements the Jewish state has with an Arab country.

The Times of Israel added:

  • A number of former Jordanian officials have expressed concern that an agreement between Israel and the Palestinians could harm vital Jordanian interests. Jordan, for instance, has been reportedly concerned over security arrangements in the West Bank after an Israeli withdrawal, fearing it might be harmed by an upsurge in terrorism were the IDF to completely vacate the area; Israel demands that the IDF remain deployed along the West Bank-Jordan border even after a peace treaty is reached, the PA rejects the demand, and the US has been trying to find a compromise.
  • The London-based daily Al-Hayat further reported on Thursday that conservative Jordan politicians understand a framework agreement being drafted by the US as abrogating the Palestinian “right of return,” therefore necessitating the granting of permanent citizenship to some 2 million Palestinians currently residing in Jordan.
  • The details of the framework deal, which is being pushed by US Secretary of State John Kerry, have yet to be released to the media.
  • Samir Rifa’i, a conservative former prime minister, reportedly told Jordanian politicians he was worried that the negotiations “may result in decisions that will not serve the Palestinian cause.” His father, former prime minister Zeid Rifa’i, seemed less worried, reported Al-Hayat, opining that Kerry’s efforts to reach an agreement “will not succeed.”
  • In order to quell Jordanian concerns, Abbas recently sent Fatah official Abbas Zaki to hold talks with conservative Jordanian officials, including former ambassador to Israel Ma’arouf Bakhit and Senate speaker Abdul Ra’uf Rawabdeh.

In a particularly interesting of its article, the Times reported that:

  • According to a report Thursday on Army Radio, Netanyahu has been seeking to define a fourth bloc of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, in the vicinity of Beit El, that Israel would retain in any future agreement with the Palestinians.
  • The report, which cited an unnamed senior Israeli official involved in the negotiations, harked back to previous reports that the Israeli negotiating team has brought up the option of renting or purchasing land from the Palestinian Authority. The older reports did not specify which swaths of land Israel would seek to retain.
  • While discussing the Beit El bloc issue in the past with US Secretary of State John Kerry, Netanyahu reportedly highlighted the Jewish people’s biblical claim — Beit El is named for the site where Jacob is said to have dreamt of a ladder to heaven while fleeing from his brother, Esau. Netanyahu further explained to Kerry that Beit El was considered sacred, as according to the Bible it had for some years been home to the the Ark of the Covenant.
  • Earlier this month, Netanyahu reportedly offered to cede most Israeli settlements in the West Bank to the Palestinian Authority on the condition that Israel would be allowed to enter into a long-term lease for the land, thereby avoiding the eviction of hundreds of thousands of settlers.
  • Under such a deal, Israel would essentially pay for the right to remain in the West Bank for some 40 years.
  • The Palestinian negotiating team is said to have rejected the offer, and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has publicly ridiculed the notion.

Who to watch in 2014 — #2: Bashar al-Assad. Will he survive? Will Syria?

Bashar al-Assad.

Bashar al-Assad.

(Washington, D.C.) — This is the second in a series of columns on key people in the epicenter we should be keeping an eye on in 2014.

The first leader on my list was Jordan’s King Abdullah II — a fascinating Arab Reformer, the son of a bold Reformer, actively trying to lead his small, resource-poor, but vitally important nation towards progress and freedom, tolerance and modernity in a very tough neighborhood. The King is trying to improve his nation’s economy, is keeping close ties with the Arab world, maintains a close friendship with the U.S., and is maintaining his nation’s courageous peace treaty with Israel. He’s also actively trying to help the Palestinians and Israelis make peace. All the while, he is standing strong against the Radical forces in the region. I’m currently reading his 2011 book, Our Last Best Chance, and studying him carefully to see if he and his monarchy can navigate successfully through the upheavals of the so-called “Arab Spring.” (see my column on the King published on January 10th)

Today I want to focus on Syrian President Bashar al-Assad — a cruel dictator, the son of a cruel dictator, who is massacring his people as he presides over the implosion of a country engulfed in civil war.

Assad came to power in 2000 after the death of his father, Hafez al-Assad. But few leaders in the region are in as much danger as he at the moment.

As readers of this blog — and my novel last year, Damascus Countdown — know, I have a great interest in and concern about the future of Syria.

These are the big questions I’m asking as the year begins:

  1. Will Assad fall from power? (the West seemed poised to bring him down in 2013 after his regime used chemical weapons, but then backed off)
  2. Will he find a way to stop those trying to bring him down?
  3. How many will die in the process?
  4. Will he and his family physically survive? 
  5. If his regime collapse, will Syria be overtaken by Iran and Hezbollah, or by al Qaeda and other Radicals?

At the moment, the jury is still out.

As I noted the other day, the situation inside Assad’s Syria is horrific:

Clearly, a terrible evil has been unleashed. Syria is collapsing. It is hard to imagine putting the country back together any time soon. Indeed, we may be witnessing the beginning of the end of the geopolitical nation-state we have long known as “Syria.”

The New York Times is reporting today that “Secretary of State John Kerry pledged $380 million in new assistance on Wednesday to help civilians who are suffering because of the civil war in Syria. The pledge came as Ban Ki-moon, the United Nations secretary general, who is chairman of the donors’ conference here, said that $6.5 billion was needed to provide medical care, food, water and shelter for Syrian refugees and civilians inside the country through 2014. That is the largest appeal for assistance in the history of the United Nations. It comes as the number of Syrian refugees has grown and conditions inside the country have dramatically deteriorated.”

In my 2009 non-fiction book, Inside The Revolution — which now needs updating given the dramatic, tumultuous events of the past several years — I put Assad into a category of Mideast leaders called “Resisters.”

Let me explain, and put this point into you some context:

There are six categories I used in the book to outline the players in the region, who they are, and what they want:

1. The Radicals are extremist Muslims. They want to overthrow every regime from North Africa to the Middle East to Central Asia and replace them with Islamist dictatorships who believe that “Islam is the answer and jihad is the way.” These include groups such as al-Qaeda, Iranian Twelvers, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and Hezbollah.

2. The Reformers are moderate Muslims. They generally believe that “Islam is the answer, but jihad is not the way; we need more freedom, more openness, more protection of human rights and civil rights, free elections, free markets, and the creation of full-blown Jeffersonian democracies, if at all possible.” Historically, this category would include Kemal Ataturk; Anwar Sadat; Jordanian Kings Hussein and Abdullah II; Moroccan king Mohammed VI; and Iraqi President Jalal Talabani.

3. The Revivalists are former Muslims who have left Islam and converted to Christianity. They say that “Islam is not the answer, jihad is not the way, Jesus is the way — and the only way for our part of the world to move forward and make real and lasting social, economic and spiritual progress is to skip back in our history before Islam and revive what we once had: first-century, New Testament Christianity.” These tend to be apolitical. They don’t typically focus on political change. They are generally focused on evangelism, discipleship, church planting, pastor training, and spiritual renewal. Their numbers have swelled into the millions since 1979, despite widespread (and recently intensifying) persecution.

These are the revolutionary forces in the region, people and movements who push for dramatic, sweeping change.

But there is another set of important players:

4. The Resisters tend to be secular Arab-nationalist leaders who oppose significant change of almost any kind. They may be Muslims, but they are not jihadists. They don’t want to build an Islamic empire. They want to build their own empires. Once they gain power, they strongly oppose revolutionary movements of all kinds. They simply want to hold onto the power, wealth, and prestige that they currently have, and gain more if they can. Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak was a classic Resister. So was the late-Libyan leader Moammar Ghadaffi, and the late-Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. The royal family and senior leaders of Saudi Arabia are classic Resisters. Syrian President Bashar Assad most certainly falls into this camp. He is doing everything he can — including using chemical weapons — to resist change and maintain his own power.

5. The Reticent tend to be weak-willed Arab leaders who seem constantly pulled in opposite directions. They don’t have strong convictions. At times they appear to want peace with Israel or a modicum of political or social reform, but then other forces push back at them and they waffle or change their tune. At the moment, Mahmoud Abbas is the best example of a Reticent leader.

6. Finally, and most importantly, are the Rank-and-File — these are the 1.4 billion or so everyday Muslims citizens. They work hard, play by the rules, and try to find decent jobs so they can feed and educate their families. They long for more freedom and opportunity, but mainly they keep their heads down and try not to be interfered with. They are the audience to which the revolutionaries are playing. They are watching the battle between the Radicals and the Reformers, and they are increasingly curious about the message of the Revivalists. And some of them are making their move and joining one of the revolutionary movements. 

Few Arab leaders create a more vivid contrast that Jordan’s Abdullah and Syria’s Assad. One is a Reformer. The other is a Resister. Let us keep a close eye on them both.

Meanwhile, to my Christian friends around the world, let us remember that the Lord Jesus Christ loves these men. He created them. He cares for them. He has a plan and purpose for each of them. That’s what the Bible teaches. So let us pray faithfully for them, as well as for their families and the nations they lead at this critical time.

————————